355
Audio & Video Production344
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development250
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps173
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics140
Design & Creative169
Customer Support130
Photography & Imaging156
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Operations & Admin87
Education & Learning131
Visa made an undisclosed investment in Replit and is exploring ways for developers and their AI agents to accept Visa payments without leaving Replit.
In short: Visa has made an undisclosed investment in Replit and the two companies are exploring ways to add Visa payments inside Replit.
Visa said it has invested an undisclosed amount in Replit, a tool where people can write and run software in a web browser. Visa also said more than 1,000 of its employees already use Replit for prototyping and development, which means building quick early versions of software to test ideas.
The companies are discussing how Visa’s payment products could be built into Replit. The goal is to let developers create apps that can take payments from customers without sending people to another service.
A key focus is “agentic payments,” which is when an AI agent (a software helper that can take actions for you, like a personal assistant) can buy or sell things on a user’s behalf. Visa pointed to systems it is working on, including Visa Intelligent Commerce and its Trusted Agent Protocol, which is meant to help an AI agent identify itself and share context like its intent, so a payment can be checked and approved. Visa and Replit said these efforts are still exploratory, and they have not announced a specific joint product.
Replit also announced self-serve enterprise access. It lets companies sign contracts worth up to $200,000 without talking to a salesperson. It includes features like SSO, single sign-on (one login that works across multiple work tools), plus audit logs and permission controls.
If payments move directly into tools where software is built, it could be faster for small teams to launch apps that charge money. But it also raises a simple question: if an AI assistant is allowed to spend, who is responsible when something goes wrong (like giving a helper your credit card and hoping it only buys what you asked for)?
Source: TechCrunch AI