344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow225
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps175
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics142
Photography & Imaging156
Design & Creative170
Customer Support132
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Studies suggest “model collapse” can happen when new chatbots are trained mostly on AI-written text, but it does not prove past gains from books are erased.
In short: Researchers say future chatbots could get worse if they are trained mainly on AI-generated text instead of fresh human writing.
Researchers have been studying a risk called “model collapse.” It means an AI system can slowly lose quality when it is trained on text made by other AI systems. Think of it like making a photocopy of a photocopy again and again, where the details fade over time.
In experiments, when teams repeatedly trained new models using mostly synthetic data, meaning AI-generated data, the results became less varied and sometimes less accurate. Over multiple rounds, outputs could drift toward distorted patterns or even nonsense. Researchers describe this as a feedback loop, because AI text gets fed back into the next round of training, which can make the next model lean even more on the same AI-made patterns.
This matters for chatbots such as Anthropic’s Claude because today’s top systems were first trained on large amounts of human-written text. Human writing includes unusual phrasing, mistakes, and niche topics, and that helps chatbots handle the messy variety of real life. If the internet fills up with AI-written pages, future training collections could include more synthetic text and less authentic material.
The evidence supports a risk for future training, not proof that earlier benefits from book-based training have already been erased or that collapse is guaranteed. Some research summaries suggest that mixing in even a small amount of real-world human data can reduce the collapse effect in certain setups. The key question is whether AI companies can keep getting enough high-quality human text as more online content is written by machines.
Source: NYTimes