344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics141
Design & Creative170
Photography & Imaging156
Customer Support131
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
A new report says many AI-related risks are covered quietly inside standard insurance policies, leaving insurers and companies unsure what is protected.
In short: A new report says lawsuits tied to AI are growing, and many of the risks may fall into “silent” coverage inside standard insurance policies.
A report by the Artificial Intelligence Underwriting Company, co-authored with researchers from Anthropic and OpenAI, says insurers may be exposed to AI risks in ways they did not plan for. It estimates that more than 90% of insurers’ exposure to AI “agents” is sitting in “silent” cover inside regular policies.
“Silent” cover means the policy never mentions AI, but the wording might still make the insurer responsible. It is like finding out your home insurance also covers a new kind of damage you never discussed, and nobody priced it in.
The report says the risk is changing as companies move from simple chatbots that only talk, to AI “agents” that can take actions on their own. That shift could lead to a wider set of legal claims, including professional negligence, cyber attacks, and in extreme cases, wrongful death.
Recent cases show the range of problems. Google is defending a lawsuit seeking at least $110 million tied to its AI Overviews feature, which allegedly defamed a US solar company. Air Canada was ordered to honor a discount that its customer service chatbot made up. In another case, UK engineering group Arup lost about $25 million after fraudsters used AI-made video and audio, known as deepfakes (realistic fakes), to trick an employee into sending money.
The report warns that a major AI-related incident could trigger fights over whether insurers must pay, or lead insurers to pull back coverage. The authors compare this to what happened after September 11, when terrorism insurance became hard to get until governments stepped in. Insurers may respond by writing clearer rules, excluding some AI risks, or selling new policies designed specifically for more autonomous AI systems.
Source: Financial Times