344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development250
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics140
Design & Creative169
Customer Support131
Photography & Imaging156
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Groups tied to OpenAI, Anthropic, and investors have spent about $16 million in New York’s 12th District, turning the race into a fight over AI rules.
In short: AI-related political groups have spent about $16 million in a Manhattan congressional race, with one side trying to defeat Alex Bores and another backing him because of his stance on AI regulation.
New York’s 12th Congressional District, which includes parts of Manhattan, has become a major focus for political spending tied to the AI industry. Reporting shows about $16 million has already been spent in the contest, and that number could still grow.
At the center is Democratic candidate Alex Bores, who is running to replace longtime Representative Jerrold Nadler. Some AI-industry-aligned groups are targeting Bores because he supports stronger rules for AI, meaning government limits on how AI systems can be built and used.
One group in the anti-Bores effort is a super PAC called Leading the Future. A super PAC is a political group that can raise and spend large sums to influence elections, but it cannot coordinate directly with a candidate’s campaign (like a separate megaphone for political ads). Leading the Future is backed by people connected to Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI president Greg Brockman.
On the other side, a PAC called Public First is supporting Bores. Donations to this pro-regulation effort have come from people at Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind, plus AI safety groups. Politico reported direct donations to Bores of $168,500 from Anthropic employees, $57,000 from OpenAI employees, and $58,000 from Google and DeepMind employees.
This is not simply OpenAI versus Anthropic. It is more like an internal fight across the AI world over how much the government should step in. Watch whether spending rises as the election gets closer, and whether other races become similar proxy battles over AI rules.
Source: NYTimes