344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development250
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics140
Design & Creative169
Customer Support131
Photography & Imaging156
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have both discussed plans for the US government to own shares in major AI companies, so the public can share profits.
In short: US Senator Bernie Sanders and President Donald Trump have both raised the idea of the US government owning shares in major AI labs, so the public benefits if the companies profit.
Bernie Sanders is drafting a bill that would require big AI research labs, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, to pay a one time 50 percent tax in company stock. Stock is a form of ownership, like having a slice of a business. Under Sanders’s plan, the government would become a major shareholder and would get voting rights to influence company decisions.
Trump has also spoken about taking government stakes in AI labs. He told reporters he was discussing a deal with major AI companies that could become “a partnership with the American public.” The Financial Times notes the federal government has already spent more than $10 billion taking stakes in some semiconductor and minerals companies that it sees as important for national security.
The broader idea resembles a “sovereign wealth fund,” which is a government owned investment fund (like a national savings account that buys investments). Countries such as Norway and Saudi Arabia run large versions of these funds, often built from oil revenue. In the US, Alaska has long used a fund to pay residents dividends from oil income.
Some AI companies have even floated similar ideas in discussion papers. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reportedly met Sanders to discuss the plan.
AI systems are increasingly used in everyday services and work tools, and their creators could earn huge sums. The key public question is who should share in those gains, and how. Owning shares could send money back to taxpayers, but critics worry government ownership could blur the line between regulator and business owner, and could affect competition.
Source: Financial Times