344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development250
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics140
Design & Creative169
Customer Support131
Photography & Imaging156
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
The US government told Anthropic to disable access to its Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models worldwide, citing national security concerns.
In short: The U.S. government ordered Anthropic to immediately disable access to two of its AI models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.
The U.S. government issued a directive on Friday ordering Anthropic to shut off access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5. Anthropic said it received the order at 5:21 pm ET and has complied.
Anthropic says the order disables the models for all users worldwide, not just people in other countries. The company said its other AI models are not affected.
Mythos 5 is Anthropic’s most capable model, and the company had already kept it tightly limited. Anthropic said Mythos was unusually good at finding security holes in software (like a very fast auditor that spots weak locks), so it shared the model through a controlled program called Project Glasswing with about 50 approved organizations, including Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, and CrowdStrike.
Fable 5, released three days earlier, was described by Anthropic as a version of Mythos built with extra safety blocks that prevent help in high risk areas like cybersecurity and biology. Benchmark tests from Vals AI reportedly showed it performed very strongly for a public model.
The government framed the action as an export control move, which usually means limiting access for foreign nationals. Anthropic says it believes the real concern is a claimed “jailbreak” of Fable 5, meaning a way to persuade the model to do something it is supposed to refuse.
Many people and businesses rely on top AI models for everyday work, so a sudden shutdown can be disruptive. The case also shows how quickly governments can step in when an AI system is seen as useful for finding software weaknesses, even if the company says similar abilities exist elsewhere.
Source: TechCrunch AI