344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics141
Design & Creative170
Photography & Imaging156
Customer Support131
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
In a New York Times Opinion video, Rod Dreher argues that AI plus years of stored data could make surveillance and social control easier in the US.
In short: Rod Dreher says artificial intelligence could make it easier for powerful institutions in the US to watch people and pressure them to conform.
In a New York Times Opinion video, author Rod Dreher warned that the next form of totalitarianism (a system where people are tightly controlled) might not look like Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union. He said it could be “something all American,” shaped by US culture, technology, and institutions.
Dreher argues that AI could become “the most potent tool for totalitarianism that we’ve ever seen.” His basic point is that computers can now sort and analyze huge piles of information very quickly. If the government or other powerful groups have access to years of personal data, AI can make that data easy to use, like turning a messy attic full of boxes into a searchable filing cabinet.
He links this to the large amount of digital information collected since 9/11, including under the Patriot Act. Dreher says that even if most people do not feel watched today, the tools for closer monitoring could be ready if leaders decide to use them.
Dreher also describes what he calls “soft” or “pink” totalitarianism. In his telling, pressure could come not only from the state, but also from corporations, universities, media, and workplace rules, using social and economic penalties rather than prisons.
This debate matters because many everyday activities leave digital traces, including posts, purchases, location history, and messages. Even without agreeing with Dreher’s religious language about AI, his warning points to a real policy question: who can access personal data, and what limits should exist on using AI to track, score, or target people.
Source: NYTimes