344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow225
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth193
AI Infrastructure & MLOps175
Writing & Content Creation204
Data & Analytics142
Photography & Imaging156
Design & Creative170
Customer Support133
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
A new survey shows patients are using AI for health questions and many clinicians now discuss that information during appointments, despite accuracy worries.
In short: AI is showing up in doctor visits more often, and both patients and clinicians are figuring out how to use it safely in real time.
Patients are increasingly using AI tools to look up symptoms, test results, and treatment options before they see a clinician. That means some people arrive at appointments with printouts or notes from a chatbot, and they want a clinician to confirm what is true.
A 2026 Wolters Kluwer survey run by Ipsos looked at this shift. It surveyed 355 U.S. doctors and nurses and 254 patients in March 2026. In the results, 28% of patients said AI explains medical information more clearly than traditional health websites, and 19% said it answers health questions faster than waiting for a clinician.
The survey suggests many clinicians are not brushing this off. Nearly 60% of patients said clinicians openly engage with AI-generated information during appointments. Separately, 56% of clinicians said they review what patients bring in and explain whether it matches evidence-based sources, meaning trusted medical research and guidelines.
At the same time, clinicians reported major worries. About 74% cited “hallucinations,” which is when an AI system confidently makes things up (like a calculator giving a neat-looking but wrong answer). Another 74% worried clinicians could lose skills if they rely on AI too much. And 72% worried ads inside AI health answers could steer decisions.
Oversight is still catching up. Awareness of formal AI-governance policies among surveyed clinicians rose from 21% in 2025 to 27% in 2026, and most respondents said human experts should validate sources used in AI health content. For patients, the practical takeaway is to treat AI output as a starting point for questions, not a diagnosis, and to ask a qualified clinician to check important claims.
Source: NYTimes