344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow225
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps175
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics142
Photography & Imaging156
Design & Creative170
Customer Support132
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Paul Christiano, a US official who helped test AI safety, is joining OpenAI’s foundation board as concerns grow about industry influence on regulators.
In short: OpenAI has appointed Paul Christiano, a senior US official focused on AI safety testing, to the board of its non-profit foundation.
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, said it has added Paul Christiano to the board of the OpenAI Foundation. This non-profit group controls OpenAI’s for-profit business.
Christiano previously led AI safety work at the US Center for Artificial Intelligence Standards and Innovation, which is part of the Department of Commerce. In that role, he helped design and run government tests on “frontier” AI models, meaning the most powerful new systems from leading companies, and looked at possible national security risks.
OpenAI said Christiano was still a senior technical adviser at the government safety body when the appointment was announced. The company said he would step back from any government work connected to OpenAI, including testing or judging OpenAI’s AI models.
Christiano will also join OpenAI’s safety and security committee, and he will be a non-voting observer on the board of OpenAI’s for-profit public benefit corporation.
The move comes as AI companies face criticism over how they are governed and how they handle safety issues. It also comes amid warnings from figures in politics and tech about “regulatory capture”, which is when regulators start serving the companies they regulate, instead of the public.
AI systems are being used in more places, from customer service to research, and mistakes can affect real people. When someone moves from government testing to a company board, it can raise conflict of interest questions, even with promised safeguards (like a referee joining one team, then saying they will not referee that team). How companies handle these concerns can shape trust, future rules, and how safely AI is used.
Source: Financial Times