344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics141
Design & Creative170
Photography & Imaging156
Customer Support131
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Google will buy the initial output of a large Arkansas solar project starting in 2029, using the deal to help offset emissions from electricity use.
In short: Google has agreed to buy the initial output of a huge solar and battery project in Arkansas, as a way to offset emissions linked to its electricity use.
Google will take 100 percent of the initial output from the Steel River Energy Center in Arkansas when the project starts operating in 2029. The project is described as the biggest US solar project of its kind to begin construction.
At first, Steel River is expected to provide 1.6 gigawatts of solar power and 2 gigawatt hours of battery storage. That is enough electricity to power more than 315,000 homes each year, according to the developer. Once fully built, it is planned to reach 2.5 gigawatts of solar and 2.9 gigawatt hours of storage.
Google’s deal is a “virtual power purchase agreement,” which is a contract to pay a fixed price for electricity without physically receiving that electricity. It is a bit like paying to sponsor a new power plant even though the power still flows into the public grid. Google said this kind of long-term commitment helps developers get financing to build projects.
The Financial Times reports the deal comes as the Trump administration has tried to scale back support for renewables, including by ending or limiting tax credits.
AI services and data centers need steady electricity 24 hours a day, and solar power depends on sunshine. That means companies like Google often still draw electricity from the grid, which includes fossil fuels, even while paying for new clean power elsewhere. Critics say this can overstate how “clean” a company’s power really is, but supporters argue it still adds more renewable electricity to the system.
Source: Financial Times