332
Audio & Video Production332
Automation & Workflow223
Software Development249
Marketing & Growth204
AI Infrastructure & MLOps154
Writing & Content Creation204
Data & Analytics132
Customer Support134
Design & Creative155
Sales & Outreach123
Operations & Admin97
Photography & Imaging143
Voice & Speech132
Education & Learning122
James Strahler II pleaded guilty to federal charges for cyberstalking and using AI-made explicit images. It is the first conviction under the Take It Down Act.
In short: A Columbus, Ohio man pleaded guilty to federal charges for cyberstalking and sharing fake explicit images, in the first US conviction under the Take It Down Act.
James Strahler II, 37, of Columbus, Ohio, pleaded guilty on April 7, 2026, to federal charges including cyberstalking and other offenses tied to the Take It Down Act. The law was signed in May 2025 and makes it a crime to publish sexual images of someone without their consent, including AI-made “deepfakes” (fake images or videos that look real, like pasting a person’s face onto another body).
Authorities said Strahler targeted at least 10 victims, including adult women and minors. Investigators say he used both real images and AI-generated explicit images and videos, then sent them to victims and, in some cases, to their family members and coworkers.
Court records described how he searched for and used tools meant to “undress” people in photos, and made images by putting victims’ faces onto nude bodies. Authorities said he posted more than 700 images online and that his devices contained more than 2,400 illegal files. Prosecutors also said some material involved minors, including cases where a minor’s face was placed on an adult body.
Strahler was arrested in June 2025 after police seized his phone in April 2025. The Justice Department said he could face up to three years in prison for offenses involving minors, and he will be sentenced by US District Judge Sarah D. Morrison.
This case shows how the Take It Down Act can be used to punish people who use AI to harass others with fake sexual images. For regular people, it signals that making and sharing these fakes is being treated like a serious crime, not a prank.
Source: NYTimes