344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow225
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth193
AI Infrastructure & MLOps176
Writing & Content Creation204
Data & Analytics142
Photography & Imaging156
Design & Creative170
Customer Support133
Sales & Outreach125
Education & Learning131
Voice & Speech135
Operations & Admin87
Data centre company Elice fell sharply on its first day of trading in Seoul, raising new questions about AI-related stock prices.
In short: Shares of South Korean data centre builder Elice fell as much as 33% on their first day of trading, despite heavy demand for its IPO.
Elice, a South Korean company that builds and runs data centres for AI work, saw its shares drop to 61,400 won on Tuesday. That was far below its IPO price of 90,500 won. An IPO, or initial public offering, is when a company sells shares to the public for the first time.
The company raised about 201 billion won (about $151 million) in what was the biggest IPO on South Korea’s Kosdaq market this year. The deal drew strong interest from everyday investors. Investors put down more than 10 trillion won in deposits to apply for shares, and the retail portion was subscribed more than 400 times.
After the stock started trading, some retail investors posted worries about losses in online chat rooms. At the same time, South Korean chip stocks also fell. The Kospi index dropped 4.1%, with SK Hynix down 4.6% and Samsung Electronics down 3.3%.
Elice started in 2015 as a coding education service and later shifted to AI cloud infrastructure. Put simply, it provides the computers and networking needed to run AI, like renting out a powerful engine room for other companies’ AI software. Elice also says it can build modular data centres faster, and it uses liquid cooling to help high-performance chips avoid overheating.
Elice’s drop adds to growing doubts about how expensive AI related companies should be in the stock market. Analysts have pointed to higher interest rates, which can make it harder to fund big projects, and can make investors more cautious about long-term returns.
Source: Financial Times