Debate grows over whether AI can be "on the side of the angels"

In short: More writers and public speakers are using the phrase “the side of the angels” to talk about AI, but the real debate is about how people choose to use AI.

What's going on

Some executives and commentators have started describing AI work as being “on the side of the angels.” In this context, the phrase is not a factual claim that AI is moral or spiritual. It is a way of saying they believe AI can be built and used for good outcomes.

At the same time, many critics point out a basic fact about today’s AI systems, especially large language models, or LLMs (programs that predict the next word in a sentence, like very advanced autocomplete). These systems can write convincing text without truly understanding it. That can make them useful for education and customer service, but also useful for persuasion, manipulation, or scams.

Public discussions are increasingly framing AI as a tool with “dual use.” That means it can be used in more than one way, like a kitchen knife that can cook dinner or cause harm. Some debates focus on benefits such as learning support or emotional companionship. Others focus on risks like misinformation and targeted influence.

What to watch

The main question is shifting from “Is AI good or bad?” to “Who is responsible for the outcomes?” Many commentators argue AI has no independent goals or moral judgment, so the moral balance depends on human choices, including design rules, oversight, and where AI is deployed. Expect more attention on clear accountability, including when AI-generated content must be labeled and who is blamed when it causes harm.

Source: NYTimes