344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development250
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics141
Design & Creative169
Customer Support131
Photography & Imaging156
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
In a new book, Cory Doctorow argues many AI tools are being used to monitor and control workers, and he warns the current AI spending boom may not last.
In short: Cory Doctorow says today’s AI boom is pushing workplaces toward systems where people serve the machine, not the other way around.
Cory Doctorow, a science fiction author and tech journalist, has a new book called The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI. In an interview with Ars Technica, he argues that much of the public conversation about AI is driven by big spending and big promises, not what is actually useful.
Doctorow uses two terms to explain the difference between helpful and harmful tech at work. A “centaur” is a person using a tool to do their job better, like a doctor using software to help spot a possible tumor on an X-ray. A “reverse centaur” is the opposite, where the person becomes a helper for the machine, like an Amazon delivery driver monitored by cameras and rules that effectively run the job.
He says this shows up when companies try to replace skilled workers with AI and keep a small number of humans to check the AI’s output. In that setup, the human can end up taking the blame when the AI makes mistakes.
Doctorow is not against AI in general. He describes using AI tools himself, including Whisper (speech-to-text software) for transcribing audio, and a chatbot for catching typos. He also points to examples where AI helps people do careful work, like finding patterns in police reports to support wrongful conviction reviews.
Doctorow warns that AI companies are spending huge amounts on data centers and computing power, while many AI products still lose money. If prices rise and customers cut back, the current AI investment wave could shrink quickly, leaving fewer services, but also cheaper hardware and more open tools for smaller teams to use.
Source: Arstechnica