344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow225
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps175
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics142
Photography & Imaging156
Design & Creative170
Customer Support133
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
AstroForge says its 2027 Autonomy-1 probe will rely on a small AI model onboard to handle spacecraft operations with little or no help from Earth.
In short: AstroForge says its next spacecraft, planned for 2027, will use onboard AI to handle many decisions that mission teams usually make from Earth.
AstroForge, a startup working on asteroid mining, says it has built an autonomous control system for spacecraft called Solo. The company says Solo uses a small “transformer” AI model (the same general family of AI used in many chatbots) along with standard flight control software.
Space missions are often run by large teams on the ground who send commands to the spacecraft. TechCrunch notes that NASA’s OSIRIS-REx asteroid mission had about 100 operators per eight-hour shift. AstroForge does not have resources like that, and it also faced problems communicating with its Odin spacecraft in 2025 because deep-space communication depends on a limited number of very large antennas and short contact windows.
AstroForge’s plan is to put more decision-making onboard, so the spacecraft can notice problems and try fixes on its own. For example, the company describes a case where the AI could connect a power problem to a faulty “star tracker” (a camera-like sensor that helps a spacecraft figure out where it is) and then try a simple reset (like turning a device off and back on).
Before it hands over control, AstroForge plans to fly Solo in “shadow mode” on its DeepSpace-2 vehicle, expected to launch by the end of 2026. Shadow mode means the AI watches and suggests actions, but humans still make the final call.
If this works, it could make deep-space missions cheaper to operate, because the spacecraft would rely less on constant help from Earth. It also raises a key question: how much control should we give software when there is no easy way to step in if something goes wrong.
Source: TechCrunch AI