344
Productivity & Workflow355
Automation & Workflow224
Software Development251
Marketing & Growth192
AI Infrastructure & MLOps174
Writing & Content Creation203
Data & Analytics141
Design & Creative170
Photography & Imaging156
Customer Support131
Sales & Outreach125
Voice & Speech135
Education & Learning131
Operations & Admin87
Vendors at a police tech conference pitched AI tools like facial recognition, license plate readers, and report writing, raising concerns about automation in policing.
In short: Companies are increasingly selling AI tools to police departments to automate parts of everyday policing, from writing reports to identifying people.
A new report from The Verge describes how police technology vendors are pitching more AI products to law enforcement agencies in the US. The reporting centers on the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Technology Conference, held in May in Fort Worth, Texas.
Attendees told the reporter that the show floor featured tools such as facial recognition cameras, automated license plate readers, body cameras, chatbots that can handle non-emergency 911 calls, gunshot detection systems, drones, and software that writes police reports. Facial recognition is a computer system that tries to match a face to a name by comparing photos, like flipping through a giant digital photo album.
The pitch is familiar, automate routine work so officers can focus on other tasks. But the Verge report notes that in policing, so-called busywork can be tied to legal steps, like carefully writing reports and reviewing a suspect’s history. Mistakes, or over-reliance on automated suggestions, can affect real people’s lives.
The article also frames this as a business opportunity, since police departments have funding that vendors want to win. As more policing work moves from in-person interactions to screens and systems, the industry appears to be leaning further into automation.
A key question is how police departments will set rules for when officers can use these tools and how much they can trust them. Another is transparency, meaning whether the public can learn what tools are being used and how decisions are made. Local governments may also face pressure to prove these systems are accurate and fair before expanding them.
Source: The Verge AI